Is it One, Two, or Three…

Readers, This study takes us back to the early Jewish Christians. How could the early Jewish Christians hold claim to absolute monotheism while worship could be directed to Jesus Christ as well as to God the Father? A large part of our problem with the study of Christ comes from having set aside the earlyContinue reading →
Readers,

This study takes us back to the early Jewish Christians. How could the early Jewish Christians hold claim to absolute monotheism while worship could be directed to Jesus Christ as well as to God the Father?

A large part of our problem with the study of Christ comes from having set aside the early Jewish believers theology of Christ. Everything for the Jewish church centered on divine identity.

We’ve managed to take terms like, ‘And the Word was with God, or, ‘He existed in the form of God, away from their Hebrew thought form. These expressions are deeply embedded in ancient Judaism. They are Hebrew reflections on a great mystery to be found in God Himself.

x

Identity was the hallmark of Jewish Christianity

The earliest believers saw Jesus Christ as intrinsic to who God really is. Jewish believers were schooled in the Scriptures and in the ancient sages. God is one! That’s all they needed to know. At the same time they believed that in the one true God was this mystery they called the ‘Word,’ or, the ‘Form‘, or the ‘Image‘, or the ‘Glory‘, or the ‘Shekinah.’

So, were the early Jewish Christians Oneness believers, Twoness believers, or Threeness believers.

The truth is that none of these beliefs would accord entirely with the theology of the early Jewish church. While the earliest Christians were absolute monotheist, they also believed that Jesus Christ originated in and came forth from the Father, that is, without becoming separate from Him in His spiritual being. And this was part of the mystery.

It should also be noted that the early Jewish believers generally saw the Holy Spirit in connection with either the Father or the Son. In Judaism itself the Holy Spirit was often reckoned as the spirit of the Messiah and/or as the emanating power and presence of God.

However, the Jewish rabbis did begin to accuse the Christian Jews of believing in two powers in heaven. (Not three.) They had become familiar with the book of Hebrews as well as with the gospels. The rabbis used the book Hebrews as a backdrop in their accusations against the Christian Jews, and especially where it says,

“In these last days [the Father] has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world.” (He1:2)

— This statement pretty much qualifies the earliest theology of the Jewish church. It says that in the last days God has spoken to us (or speaks to us) in His Son, and that it was through His Son that the Father made the world. Such a mystery, this. –

x

Looking again at Godhead theology

A great many scholars today are beginning to set aside the notion that the trinitarian doctrine is intrinsic to Christianity and that to be a Christian you must accept this form of theology. They are reaching back to the pre-Constantianian beliefs of the early church, that is, to a more Hebraic form of theology. The result is a less complicated theology held by the early church, yet not without its own mysteries concerning the Father and the Son.

The problem is that neither the trinitarian nor the oneness doctrines can be accredited as the final stages of true theology. They are both departees from an already fully divine Christology of Biblical Christianity. The early believers fully accepted Jesus Christ as Yahweh of the former testament, and yet they believed in a Father-Son view of God.

Paul Himself brings this forth in reaffirming the sh’ma of Israel. He said,

“Yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we exist for Him; and one Lord, Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we exist through Him.” (1Co8:6)

Where Paul says ‘Lord’ he is using the ancient ‘She’ma’ creed of Israel.

“Hear, O Israel! The LORD is our God, the LORD is one!” (Deu 6:4 NASB)

 

Jesus said that He and the Father were one. Thus Paul is expressing a very ancient belief in Israel. Jesus was looked at as the ‘eikon‘ (divine image) of the invisible God. Judaism believed that you had the invisible God who could not be seen, and God who makes Himself visible across history and across time. Or, as one early Christian writer said, “God brought forth from Himself a beginning.”

The point is that for the early Jewish believers, Jesus did not become for them a second god or another deity. Paul explained Christ as the hidden mystery of God. The apostle wrote,

“To me, the very least of all the saints, this grace was given, to preach to the Gentiles the unfathomable riches of Christ, and to bring to light what is the administration of the mystery which for ages has been hidden in God who created all things.” (Eph3:8,9)

Note. My readers may wish to review additional Hebraic studies. Go to:

http://www.christianchallenge.org/hebraic-foundations/index.html

Check these studies:

Regardless of how difficult this may seem to us, the groundwork had already been laid for this mystery to be revealed.

For instance how is it than an orthodox one-God, Jewish man could fall down before Jesus, and say, “My Lord and my God?” And how is it that everything Jesus did in His earthly walk reveals that He was intrinsic to the very identity of God’s person? Jesus did God things.

x

 

The most Jewish of non-Jewish religions

And so we must agree with the Jewish author who said that Christianity is the most Jewish of all the non-Jewish faiths. I would go further to say that Biblical Christianity fills out the Jewish faith in that the God of the Hebrews came into the earth as a man to fulfill His own program of redemption.

Did the early Jewish believers worship the Father and Son as one God? Absolutely. They did this with a true monotheistic faith.

John said it well enough;

“Anyone who goes too far and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God; the one who abides in the teaching, he has both the Father and the Son.” (2Jn1:9)

Do we still have a mystery? Sure we do. It is a mystery that is wondrous indeed. What we know is that the origins of Jesus lies within God Himself. And when we worship Jesus we are not worshipping a second deity. We are worshipping the Father in the Son.

And so I return to the premise of this study — A large part of our problem with the study of Christ is our failure to understand that the early Jewish Church already had the perfect godhead theology.

So the study does have a point. Where you see that God is one, believe that God is one. Where you see the Father and the Son, believe in the Father and the Son. And where you see the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, believe in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Just be a Biblical believer.

The terms oneness, twoness, or threeness don’t really matter. We know there can only be be one true God. While we may view Him through different glasses, the story remains unchanged. God sent His Son into the world to be the Savior and Redeemer of humanity. Does this mean that God had a Son before time began? (Wow – Now that is a question. Think about it.)

What think ye?

Blessings,

Buddy

 

Views: 36

Posted by Buddy

Lawrence "Buddy" Martin and his wife Betty are co-founders of Christian Challenge International. They have served the Lord in the ministry since the mid-1960s. They began Christian Challenge in 1976 with a stewardship from the Lord. The ministry began as a ‘School for Christian Workers’. It was Brother Buddy’s vision for ministry and missions that has led graduates of the school to enter the ministry as pastors or missionaries. Multiplied hundreds of disciples have been trained under the auspices of Christian Challenge.

2 comments

Daniel Cantu

what I find very interesting is the term of deity is usually changed to accomidate the view point being defended, ie., Oneness people call Jesus, “the son of God”, Trinitarians call Him, “God the son”.
I find it un-biblical in “oneness”, to call Jesus the Father (I don’t know where in the Bible Jesus is referred to as the Father) therefore removing the role of advocate (for humanity) with the Father from Jesus. We would stand before the Father without the blood covering of the son, Jesus.
Perhaps this is why there is so much legalism in “oneness” doctrinal based churches. They’ve inadvertently removed the blood covering, much like old-school Mormonism did.
Thank you bro. Buddy for your wonderful expository.

Daniel,

I certainly agree with you about how varied camps set about to defend their own position. This is why I try to help my readers to understand the thought form in which the Bible was written. (i.e. Hebrew.)

You are welcome for the study. Thanks for responding.

Blessings,

Buddy

Leave a Reply